Articles
24 September 2025
Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025)

GekoTM system to predict peripheral nerve stimulation: reality or fantasy? A prospective pilot study

Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
19
Views
10
Downloads

Authors

Peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is an established therapy for chronic pain refractory to conventional treatments. Wearable devices such as the gekoTM system, originally developed to enhance lower limb circulation, may have potential as non-invasive screening tools to predict PNS candidacy. The present prospective, uncontrolled pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using the gekoTM device for predicting responsiveness to implanted PNS in patients with refractory chronic pain. Twenty patients with refractory chronic pain were treated with low-frequency common peroneal nerve stimulation (1 Hz, 6 hours/day) for 10 consecutive days using the gekoTM device. Outcomes included Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores, quality of life (QoL), oxygen saturation index (SpO2), and patient satisfaction. The primary endpoint was defined as the proportion of patients achieving a reduction of ≥50% in NRS scores. Statistical significance was evaluated using paired t-tests (p<0.05). Treatment led to significant improvements in pain, SpO2, and QoL. Half of the patients achieved the primary endpoint, and no serious adverse events were reported. The satisfaction rate among completed cases was 100%. The gekoTM device shows promise as a non-invasive screening tool for PNS candidacy. These results should be interpreted cautiously, given the small sample size, lack of a control group, and exploratory design. Larger, controlled trials are warranted.

Altmetrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

1. van Hecke O, Austin SK, Khan RA, et al. Neuropathic pain in the general population: a systematic review of epidemiological studies. Pain 2014;155:654-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2013.11.013
2. Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, et al. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain 2006;10:287-333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpain.2005.06.009
3. Doucet BM, Lam A, Griffin L. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for skeletal muscle function. Yale J Biol Med 2012;85:201-2015.
4. Sluka KA, Walsh D. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: Basic science mechanisms and clinical effectiveness. J Pain 2003;4:109-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1054/jpai.2003.434
5. Gokhale S, Haddad N, Andrews N, et al. Microcirculatory benefits of peroneal nerve stimulation: a systematic review. J Vasc Surg 2020;72:2095-103.
6. Ferguson RA, Dodd MJ, Paley VR. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation via the peroneal nerve is superior to graduated compression socks in reducing perceived muscle soreness following intense intermittent endurance exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol 2014;114:2223-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-014-2943-5

How to Cite



GekoTM system to predict peripheral nerve stimulation: reality or fantasy? A prospective pilot study. (2025). Advances in Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.4081/aapm.54

Similar Articles

1-10 of 30

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.